Capture the notion of invertible functions
Intro
This article is originally posted on Code Review. And I think this can also be a good post.
Motivation
I find sometimes it is useful to capture the notion of invertible functions.
The idea is that if two functions f :: a -> b and g :: b -> a are the inverse function of each other, and if there is another function h :: b -> b, then h can also work on values of type a.
Moreover, if theref' and g' are another pair of functions that are the inverse function of each other, (f,g) and (f',g') can actually be composed to (f' . f, g . g') and the invertibility still holds.
The following is my attempt to implement this in haskell, and I’m wondering if an existing library can do the same thing (or even more general thing) for me. Also advice and comments about my code are appreciated.
Implemnetation
First I use records to store two functions:
data Invertible a b = Invertible
{ into :: a -> b
, back :: b -> a
}
into means “convert a into b” while back means “convert b back to a”.
And then few helper functions:
selfInv :: (a -> a) -> Invertible a a
selfInv f = Invertible f f
flipInv :: Invertible a b -> Invertible b a
flipInv (Invertible f g) = Invertible g f
borrow :: Invertible a b -> (b -> b) -> a -> a
borrow (Invertible fIn fOut) g = fOut . g . fIn
liftInv :: (Functor f) => Invertible a b -> Invertible (f a) (f b)
liftInv (Invertible a b) = Invertible (fmap a) (fmap b)In the above code borrow will use the pair of functions to make its last argument g available to values of type a. And changing borrow f to borrow (flipInv f) will make g available to values of type b. Therefore borrow captures my initial idea of making a function of type b -> b available for values of a if a and b can be converted to each other.
In addition, Invertible forms a monoid-like structure, I use rappend and rempty to suggest a similiarity between it and Monoid:
rempty :: Invertible a a
rempty = selfInv id
rappend :: Invertible a b
-> Invertible b c
-> Invertible a c
(Invertible f1 g1) `rappend` (Invertible f2 g2) =
Invertible (f2 . f1) (g1 . g2)Examples
Here I have two examples to demonstrate that Invertible might be useful.
Data Encryption
It is natural that Invertible can be used under scenario of symmetric encryption. Invertible (encrypt key) (decrypt key) might be one instance if:
To simplify a little, I make an example of Caesar cipher and assume that plain text contains only uppercase letters:
-- constructor should be invisible from outside
newtype OnlyUpper a = OnlyUpper
{ getOU :: [a]
} deriving (Eq, Ord, Show, Functor)
ouAsList :: Invertible (OnlyUpper a) [a]
ouAsList = Invertible getOU OnlyUpper
onlyUpper :: String -> OnlyUpper Char
onlyUpper = OnlyUpper . filter isAsciiUpper
upperAsOrd :: Invertible Char Int
upperAsOrd = Invertible ord' chr'
where
ord' x = ord x - ord 'A'
chr' x = chr (x + ord 'A')And Caesar Cipher is basically doing some modular arithmetic:
modShift :: Int -> Int -> Invertible Int Int
modShift base offset = Invertible f g
where
f x = (x + offset) `mod` base
g y = (y + (base - offset)) `mod` base
caesarShift :: Invertible Int Int
caesarShift = modShift 26 4
caesarCipher :: Invertible (OnlyUpper Char) (OnlyUpper Char)
caesarCipher = liftInv (upperAsOrd
-- Char <-> Int
`rappend` caesarShift
-- Int <-> Int
`rappend` flipInv upperAsOrd)
-- Int <-> CharOne way to use Invertible is just using its into and back as encrypt and decrypt, and Invertible also gives you the power of manipulating encrypyed data as if it was plain text:
exampleCaesar :: IO ()
exampleCaesar = do
let encF = into caesarCipher
decF = back caesarCipher
encrypted = encF (onlyUpper "THEQUICKBROWNFOX")
decrypted = decF encrypted
encrypted' = borrow (flipInv caesarCipher
`rappend` ouAsList) (++ "JUMPSOVERTHELAZYDOG") encrypted
decrypted' = decF encrypted'
print encrypted
-- OnlyUpper {getOU = "XLIUYMGOFVSARJSB"}
print decrypted
-- OnlyUpper {getOU = "THEQUICKBROWNFOX"}
print encrypted'
-- OnlyUpper {getOU = "XLIUYMGOFVSARJSBNYQTWSZIVXLIPEDCHSK"}
print decrypted'
-- OnlyUpper {getOU = "THEQUICKBROWNFOXJUMPSOVERTHELAZYDOG"}Matrix manipulation
Sometimes it’s convenient to write some code that manipulates matrices using Invertible.
Say there is a list of type [Int] in which 0 stands for an empty cell, and we want every non-zero element move to their leftmost possible position while preserving the order:
compactLeft :: [Int] -> [Int]
compactLeft xs = nonZeros ++ replicate (((-) `on` length) xs nonZeros) 0
where nonZeros = filter (/= 0) xsNow consider 2D matrices, we want to “gravitize” the matrix so that every non-zero element in it falls to {left,right,up,down}-most possible position while preserving the order.
data Dir = DU | DD | DL | DR deriving (Eq, Ord, Enum, Show, Bounded)
gravitizeMat :: Dir -> [[Int]] -> [[Int]]
gravitizeMat dir = borrow invertible (map compactLeft)
where mirrorI = selfInv (map reverse)
diagonalI = selfInv transpose
invertible = case dir of
DL -> rempty
DR -> mirrorI
DU -> diagonalI
DD -> diagonalI `rappend` mirrorIhere Invertible comes into play by the observation that transpose and map reverse are all invertible (moreover, they are inverse functions of themselves). So that we can tranform matrices and pretend the problem is only “gravitize to the left”.
Here is one example:
print2DMat :: (Show a) => [[a]] -> IO ()
print2DMat mat = do
putStrLn "Matrix: ["
mapM_ print mat
putStrLn "]"
exampleMatGravitize :: IO ()
exampleMatGravitize = do
let mat = [ [1,0,2,0]
, [0,3,4,0]
, [0,0,0,5]
]
print2DMat mat
let showExample d = do
putStrLn $ "Direction: " ++ show d
print2DMat $ gravitizeMat d mat
mapM_ showExample [minBound .. maxBound]And the result will be:
Matrix: [
[1,0,2,0]
[0,3,4,0]
[0,0,0,5]
]
Direction: DU
Matrix: [
[1,3,2,5]
[0,0,4,0]
[0,0,0,0]
]
Direction: DD
Matrix: [
[0,0,0,0]
[0,0,2,0]
[1,3,4,5]
]
Direction: DL
Matrix: [
[1,2,0,0]
[3,4,0,0]
[5,0,0,0]
]
Direction: DR
Matrix: [
[0,0,1,2]
[0,0,3,4]
[0,0,0,5]
]
Complete code
You can find my complete code from gist.
